Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content
From: Wilson Roberto Afonso <wilson () zaz com br>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 14:39:18 -0300
On Tue, 04 Aug 1998 21:38:16 -0400, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com> wrote:
The screening problem is "AI complete". That is, it requires full AI to detect sufficiently evil violators -- if even that would work. [...] If the user is sophisticated, forget having even hand screening work. If hand screening won't work, what will?
On the other hand, if you are paranoid/determined enough, you might just block whatever you cannot screen. So, binary attachments are out, just as uuencoded files etc. If you're not sure it's safe to go, it does not go. Might still not be a 100% safe without hand screening, though. -Wilson
Current thread:
- Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Bruce B. Platt (Aug 04)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Marcus J. Ranum (Aug 04)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Perry E. Metzger (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Thomas Schiavinato (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content6 Chad Schieken (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content6 Joseph S. D. Yao (Aug 06)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Thomas Schiavinato (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Wilson Roberto Afonso (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Joseph S. D. Yao (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content and other things cfb (Aug 06)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Perry E. Metzger (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Ted Doty (Aug 05)
- Re: Screening Mail Policy&Product Paul Woodie (Aug 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Screening Outgoing Mail for Content Dave O'Shea (Aug 05)