Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080
From: Zach Brown <zab () zabbo net>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 10:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, Gigi Sullivan wrote:
Well, the SOCKS server listen on port 1080. I dunno if there are some kind of vulnerability, but it seems that someone tryed to see if you have a SOCKS server to connect to, IMHO.
http://geek-girl.com/bugtraq/1998_3/0103.html theoretically 1.0r5 compiled with libident is remotely exploitable, but I haven't sat down and hammered it out. 1.0r6 from www.socks.nec.com fixes it, but naughty people shouldn't be getting at the server to begin with, as we all well know :) -- zach - - - - - - 007 373 5963
Current thread:
- Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Roger Marquis (Aug 16)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Massimo Brogioni (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Gigi Sullivan (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Zach Brown (Aug 19)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Daniel J. Gregor Jr. (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Erlend Midttun (Aug 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Vern Paxson (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Kinczli Zoltán (Aug 18)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Rik Farrow (Aug 23)