Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: chroot useful?
From: Darren Reed <darrenr () cyber com au>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:50:47 +1100 (EST)
In some mail I received from Anton J Aylward, sie wrote
We can throw this back and forward like a shuttlecock, "A does", "B doesn't" ..... but its like a mathematical proof. That ONE does means that one or more HAS made kernel changes.
That I wasn't attempting to dispute (I recognise that this is the case and Borderware aren't alone in having done this) - I was and still am quite aware that some do this. The point I was making is that it doesn't seem to have given those that have an advantage when it comes to market penetration. Darren
Current thread:
- Re: Hardening, (was Re: chroot useful?), (continued)
- Re: Hardening, (was Re: chroot useful?) Paul D. Robertson (Nov 21)
- Re: chroot useful? C. Harald Koch (Nov 20)
- Re: chroot useful? Marcus J. Ranum (Nov 16)
- Re: chroot useful? Wolfgang Ley (Nov 16)
- Re: chroot useful? Darren Reed (Nov 16)
- Re: chroot useful? Aleph One (Nov 17)
- syscall wrappers (was Re: chroot useful?) Bennett Todd (Nov 17)
- Re: syscall wrappers (was Re: chroot useful?) George Ross (Nov 20)
- RE: chroot useful? Y. W. Ko (Nov 16)
- Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 17)
- Re: chroot useful? Darren Reed (Nov 20)
- Firewalling DCOM and brethren David C Niemi (Nov 21)
- Re: Firewalling DCOM and brethren Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd (Nov 21)
- Re: chroot useful? Darren Reed (Nov 20)
- Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 17)
- RE: chroot useful? Joseph Judge (Nov 17)
- Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 17)
- Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 17)
- Re: chroot useful? C. Harald Koch (Nov 20)
- Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 20)
- Re: chroot useful? chuck yerkes (Nov 21)
- Re: chroot useful? Adam Shostack (Nov 21)
- Re: chroot useful? chuck yerkes (Nov 21)