Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: Virtual Routing for Voice Traffic


From: Nicholas Garigliano <ngarigl8 () NAZ EDU>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:35:12 -0400

Technically, it is easily doable.  The one thing to the keep in mind is the
stability of your data network, i.e. layer 2-3.  Any issues will shut down
your phones and that might be considered a safety issue (i.e. 911 for
dorms) depending on where you are located.

Nick Garigliano
Network Security Engineer
Enterprise & Network Solutions
Nazareth College
585 389-2109

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Rob Milman <rob.milman () sait ca> wrote:

Hi John,

We've been running our voice network on a separate VLAN on our data
network for well over a decade. It's worked well for us with no problems
that I can recall.

Regards,

Rob
Southern Alberta Institute of Technology

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of John Center
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 6:40 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: [SECURITY] Virtual Routing for Voice Traffic

Hi,

(I posted this to the NETMAN list, but I thought I'd also ask the Security
people, since this is one of our concerns.)

We're having a debate about how to best route voice traffic over our data
network.  Right now, we have a physically separate data & voice
infrastructure, but want to consolidate for cost savings.  How many schools
are using virtual routing to separate voice & data over a common network
infrastructure?  How many are running both without any routing separation,
except for voice VLANs?  Why?

Inquiring minds want to know...  :-)

Thanks.

     -John

--
John Center
Villanova University


Current thread: