Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program
From: Emery Rudolph <erudolph () UMD EDU>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:35:32 +0000
Kevin, In general, the majority of the conversation on the campus community (remember - it's summer) has been more a sense of resignation than anger. Most of the reaction I have seen has been very soft with a lot of "of course they are monitoring, no surprise". Of course, I am referring to reaction from those in the IT community, not the academic side, but based on my prior interactions with them, I would imagine a more strident reaction from them as they tend to have a more Very Best Regards, Emery Rudolph, MS Manager IT-ETI-PS Enterprise UNIX Services University of Maryland (301) 405-9379 http://www.umd.edu [University of Maryland] From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin Halgren Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 1:44 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program While I appreciate the discussions, I really interested what, if any, response you hear from the broader campus community on the matter. Sometimes with things like this I expect a riot, particularly from faculty or students and instead just get a "meh." Do the educated masses even care? My suggested response in the event anyone asks my CIO about this is as follows: "We view this as a legal issue, not a technology or service provider issue. There is nothing to indicate that anything unlawful has occurred even if all these allegations are true, nor could an internal system protect our users communications against lawful interception any more than Google or Microsoft. We may not like what current law allows and can protest against it, but in the end we are obliged to obey these laws." Kevin On 6/7/2013 8:02 AM, Kevin Halgren wrote: For those of you already using Google or Microsoft cloud e-mail solutions, I'll be curious to hear the reactions on your campuses to this news. I believe the tech companies are telling the truth when they say they don't provide direct backdoor access into their systems and that the PRISM presentation may overstate the cooperation and capabilities of the system, however that doesn't preclude the government from abusing existing systems and capabilities e.g. those under CALEA lawful intercept capabilities. Kevin ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6369 - Release Date: 05/30/13 Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Current thread:
- Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Kevin Halgren (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Tim Doty (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Flynn, Gary - flynngn (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Manjak, Martin (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Mark Monroe (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Manjak, Martin (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Jesse Thompson (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Kevin Halgren (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Stockdale, Alan (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Tim Doty (Jun 07)