Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program
From: Emery Rudolph <erudolph () UMD EDU>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:20:03 +0000
Gary, I have had similar thoughts and have been on the fence about this, because I too see the value in the security agencies having access to data that keeps our country, assets and friends safe. The issue invariably comes down to how willing are we as a country to blatantly dismiss the 4th amendment rights to privacy, which parenthetically extent to modern day areas like data. You hit the nail on the head when you said the issue is really the abuse of power, which is absolutely 100% inevitable. It is in these abuses that we run the danger of unjustly persecuting and prosecuting people because of personal and evil motives. Our constitutional rights are not a hindrance to our safety, as much as they define who we are as a nation. Freedom of privacy does necessitate that the intelligence community become more adept at finding effective ways to track those who mean us harm, but in the end, that is much more palatable than simply gathering data on everyone and sifting through. That is more than a slippery slope, it is a fast track to corruption of our values and a breakdown of our identity. All of that is personal opinion and not reflective on any views of my institution. On the matter of Information Technology - I am very interested to learn the actual mechanisms employed by the NSA to house and mine this data, how much data do they collect and how long do they retain it? What types of infrastructures they have in place to allow this to be efficient and effective. The NSA has the keys to most major technology ciphers, but it is possible to still encrypt data with non-standard ciphers that use astronomically larger and stronger keys offset enough to secure your data. Of course, this requires a lot of work and coordination, but can be done. Very Best Regards, Emery Rudolph, MS Manager IT-ETI-PS Enterprise UNIX Services University of Maryland (301) 405-9379 http://www.umd.edu -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Flynn, Gary - flynngn Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 9:45 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program <personal opinion> I think if anyone expects the government to foil terrorism plots, such monitoring is necessary. There is certainly a substantial risk of abuse and scope creep but I don't see any realistic option. If terrorists are allowed to leverage today's technology unimpeded, there will be larger and more coordinated attacks. When something happens, people will ask "why didn't you know about that?". Our society is extremely vulnerable. If you cannot fix the vulnerabilities, you have to monitor and detect. Our freedom is our vulnerability so I don't think anyone wants to "fix" that. Some privacy may have to be sacrificed to preserve freedom. Scope creep is probably the primary threat. "We must monitor threats to the American way of life and our economy. We will add the following to the definition of terrorist - tobacco smugglers, DMCA violators, gun collectors, spam senders, and people who don't curb their dogs". There is a large gray area in the middle where I'm sure there will be constant disagreement and worries about who will watch the watchers. I don't like it. But I think it is necessary. </personal opinion> On 6/7/13 9:02 AM, "Kevin Halgren" <kevin.halgren () WASHBURN EDU> wrote:
For those of you already using Google or Microsoft cloud e-mail solutions, I'll be curious to hear the reactions on your campuses to this news. I believe the tech companies are telling the truth when they say they don't provide direct backdoor access into their systems and that the PRISM presentation may overstate the cooperation and capabilities of the system, however that doesn't preclude the government from abusing existing systems and capabilities e.g. those under CALEA lawful intercept capabilities. Kevin -- Kevin Halgren Assistant Director - Systems and Network Services Washburn University (785) 670-2341 kevin.halgren () washburn edu
Current thread:
- Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Kevin Halgren (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Tim Doty (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Flynn, Gary - flynngn (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Manjak, Martin (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Mark Monroe (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Manjak, Martin (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Jesse Thompson (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Kevin Halgren (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Stockdale, Alan (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Emery Rudolph (Jun 07)
- Re: Reactions to reported NSA PRISM program Tim Doty (Jun 07)