Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Federal Rules of Evidence
From: Dave Koontz <dkoontz () MBC EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:32:34 -0400
Not to get into a philosophical debate, but if a significant demographic operate a certain way for whatever reason, perhaps you should change your expectations rather than asking the entire group to change on your behalf? Is a 40k email really a significant issue in this day and age with such things as streaming media? Bandwidth and digital storage are also many times what they were a decade or so ago. I know 'Nix users and other old schoolers have a post bottom creed of plain text, but you are holding on to an ideal whose time has past. I too pushed back on such things for countless years, but I learned this is not something that can be "fixed". On 9/2/2011 11:47 AM, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: People - trim irrelevant parts of text when you reply. Some of these things are now pushing 40K and two embedded images - neither of which apply to the person replying. Yes, I know most of you are forced at gunpoint to use MUAs that insist on top-quoting and make it difficult to trim stuff. But it doesn't have to be that way...
Current thread:
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence, (continued)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Parmenus Bowler (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Madamas Sotiris (Sep 06)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Wayne Bullock (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Myers, Julie (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Purvis, Cameron (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Schattle, Donald (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Justice, Connie F (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Spahr, Todd M. (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Russ Leathe (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Dave Koontz (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mark Boolootian (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence John Ladwig (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ken Connelly (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Robert Lau (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Gary Flynn (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Kevin Wilcox (Sep 05)