Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Federal Rules of Evidence
From: "Justice, Connie F" <cjustice () IUPUI EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:48:38 +0000
+1 -- Connie F. Justice, MIS, CISSP Clinical Assistant Professor of Computer and Information Technology Director of IT Security Education and Experiential Learning Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI 799 W. Michigan St., ET 301 Indianapolis, IN 46202 CISSP #111852 On 9/2/11 10:44 AM, "Schattle, Donald" <SCHATTLE () PROVIDENCE EDU> wrote: +1 for interest and thanks for deciding to post to the list. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Donald J. Schattle II Information Security Officer GLB-Act Coordinator Providence College schattle () providence edu 401.865.1558 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Purvis, Cameron Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:31 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence Kevin, as long as copies are going around, I’d love to get information on your SOP. Thanks! From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Myers, Julie Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:28 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence Me too. Thanks! Julie Myers Chief Information Security Officer University of Rochester - University IT julie.myers () rochester edu <mailto:julie.myers () rochester edu> p: 585.273.1804 c: 585.208.0939 P Think twice before you print CONFIDENTIALITY: This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email from your system. Thank you. From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Wayne Bullock Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:24 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence I would very much like to see it. Thanks! Wayne Bullock, MSCIS, CCNA Associate Director Information Security Information Resource Management Florida Atlantic University 777 Glades Road Boca Raton, FL 33431 wayne () fau edu From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Daniel Bennett Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:21 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence Yes… Please send my way. Thanks. Daniel Bennett IT Security Analyst Vice-Chair North Central PA Members Alliance Pennsylvania College of Technology One College Ave Williamsport, PA 17701 P:570.329.4989 E:dbennett () pct edu From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:19 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence Daniel: We have a pretty comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure manual (SOP) that contains portions of what you are looking for but most likely not in a format that you might have in mind. I can send you – and anyone else – a copy of the Investigations section if you want. Just let me know. Being an X-Fed and then state detective I think it covers chain of custody fairly well. I can also send you our department retention schedule that covers active/inactive case retention limits. - Kevin Kevin L. McLaughlin, CISM, CISSP, GIAC-GSLC, CRISC, PMP, ITIL Master Certified Assistant Vice President, Information Security & Special Projects University of Cincinnati 513-556-9177 The University of Cincinnati is one of America's top public research institutions and the region's largest employer, with a student population of more than 41,000. [cid:3397805313_9212396] From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Bradley, Stephen W. Mr. Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:24 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence I too would be interested in your findings. thx steve From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () listserv educause edu] On Behalf Of Mark Reboli Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:22 AM To: SECURITY () listserv educause edu Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence daniel we do not have this in place but i would be very interested if you could share your results. i would add a checklist would be great as well to ensure no step is missed. m Mark Reboli Network/Telecom/IT security Manager Misericordia University 570-674-6753 From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Daniel Bennett Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:09 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence Hello All, I am wondering if anyone has developed guidelines, policy, or procedures that you follow for every IT investigation? This would cover chain of custody, line of authorities, retention of information, report formats, etc. I am looking to standardize all investigations so if an internal investigation ever becomes civil or criminal all evidence will hold up. Please reply on or off list. Thanks, Daniel Bennett IT Security Analyst Vice-Chair North Central PA Members Alliance Pennsylvania College of Technology One College Ave Williamsport, PA 17701 P:570.329.4989 E:dbennett () pct edu
Current thread:
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence, (continued)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Stephen C. Gay (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Chuck Keeler (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Daniel Bennett (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Parmenus Bowler (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Madamas Sotiris (Sep 06)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Wayne Bullock (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Myers, Julie (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Purvis, Cameron (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Schattle, Donald (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Justice, Connie F (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Spahr, Todd M. (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Russ Leathe (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Dave Koontz (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mark Boolootian (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence John Ladwig (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ken Connelly (Sep 05)