Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto
From: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:02:31 -0500
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:28:23 EST, Tim Nance said:
Three years ago we brought a Palo Alto device into our network to test it out. It wasn't quite ready for primetime. Misidentified traffic. Lacked a bit on the UI. A year ago we brought them back in, and I believe they are now fully baked.
Fully baked? How is its IPv6 support? Anybody who's not asking that question is in for trouble in the next few years...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Consolvo, Corbett D (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Nathaniel Hall (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Kevin Wilcox (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Roderick Cook (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Basgen, Brian (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Tim Nance (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Kellogg, Brian D. (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto John Ladwig (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto John Ladwig (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Nathaniel Hall (Feb 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Joe Guenther (Mar 03)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Will Froning (Mar 06)