Re: Universities riskiest place for SSN

["Moore, Frank" <moorefx () LONGWOOD EDU>]

We also use it for preparation of 1099's.

Frank


F. X. Moore III, Ph.D.
Vice President-CIO and Chief Privacy Officer
Longwood University
201 High Street
Farmville, VA 23909

[voice] 434.395.2034
[fax]   434.395.2035

moorefx () longwood edu
http://www.longwood.edu

Never send restricted information via e-mail
Unless you consult with IITS first!


On 11/8/10 4:22 PM, "Steven Alexander" <alexander.s () MCCD EDU> wrote:

I think the SSN is required to apply for financial aid.  Other than that, we don't require it, but most students 
provide it.

Steven Alexander Jr.
Online Education Systems Manager
Merced College


-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Dan 
Peterson
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 1:13 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Universities riskiest place for SSN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I agree that High-Ed does report things that private industry does not;
however, why does Higher-Ed need the student SSN in the first place

All the school I have ever been at when you complain you can get a student
ID.

- --
Dan

- -----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Lococo
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:23 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Universities riskiest place for SSN

On 11/08/2010 02:32 PM, Eric Case wrote:
> The original post,
> http://blogs.mcafee.com/consumer/identity-theft/top-ten-most-dangerous
> -place s-to-leave-your-social-security-number, says, "Robert
> Siciliano, on behalf of McAfee,  analyzed data breaches published by
> the Identity Theft Resource Center, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse and
> the Open Security Foundation that involved Social Security number
> breaches from January 2009 - October 2010 to reveal the riskiest
> places to lose your ID."
>
> It is unclear if they ranked by number of records/breach or number of
> breaches.

My read is that the number in parens at the end of each top-10 entry is a
breach-count (it's certainly not a record-count), which is used as the
ranking/sorting key.  Since the data is from a report covering 2009-2010,
it's fairly recent.

If one is looking for a methodology flaw that excuses Higher-Ed's number-one
spot on the list, it's probably the failure to account for our culture of
openness.  You don't see other industries announcing a breach and then
saying "there was no evidence of unauthorized access, but we're calling this
a breach and announcing it anyway", which is fairly common from higher-ed
institutions.  We might get dwarfed on record count as-well, but that you
can't see that data without buying the original report.

Cheers,
Mike Lococo


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.9.1 (Build 287)
Charset: us-ascii

wj8DBQFM2GfF5chTNtilRz8RAn4wAJ9gymPQEqAIIVg01pDhBOhXqdy5zwCeLTDC
Hn1Gf7GfUsZ6SRGyz8+NSdM=
=vdAe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

This email has been scanned by a Spam/Virus Firewall. If your email has been classifed as Spam please contact the 
HelpDesk at (209) 384-6180.