Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed
From: schilling <schilling2006 () GMAIL COM>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:19:57 -0400
Thanks all for replies. I may have caused some suspicion on a educause security mailing list with a gmail account and without which university I am working for. Here we go: http://directory.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/search/searchList.cgi?searchStr=ding+&searchBy=lastname&submit=Search Gmail is just easier for mailing list subscription due to the email thread feature. I am using Schilling as my English name since most people spell my name that way :-) Sincerely, Schilling Shiling Ding Office of Telecommunications Florida State University (850)645-6810(O) On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Russ Leathe <Russ.Leathe () gordon edu> wrote:
Hi Schilling, We have been using the Juniper SA4000 for over a year now. Not having to deal with a client install has been nice. The role mapping is great…especially for our vendors…they authenticate and immediately connect to their mapped drive or application automatically. We have notice a rise in the number of remote users over the past six months (mainly due to our new ERP system). Typically, requests come in for VPN access at the last minute (most of the time while they are on a plane heading to their destination). It's been great that we can accommodate our users even though they don't always plan ahead. :^) We authenticate using LDAP via MS AD. Local users can be created as well, if needed. We use the local user feature for temporary access (less than a week). Hope this helps, Russ *From:* The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *schilling *Sent:* Monday, March 24, 2008 10:58 AM *To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU *Subject:* [SECURITY] Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed Hi all, We are considering replacing our current VPN concentrator since it's EOL. Now our main consideration is either Cisco ASA5520/ASA5540 or Juniper SA2000/SA4000. Our Core network is Cisco centric for now, the VPN is primarily IPSec remote access with few site-to-site tunnels. We would like to use SSL VPN for the future. We did some evaluation last year on Juniper SA2000, it's really impressive in terms of Role Mapping with LDAP authentication(We have campus wide iPlanet LDAP infrastructure). Would you kindly share your thoughts on the VPN solutions? Thanks. Sincerely, Schilling
Current thread:
- Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed schilling (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed Consolvo, Corbett D (Mar 24)
- Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed Julian Y. Koh (Mar 24)
- Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed Jenkins, Matthew (Mar 24)
- Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed Avdagic, Indir (Mar 24)
- Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed Brock, Anthony - NET (Mar 24)
- Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed Russ Leathe (Mar 24)
- Re: Cisco VPN concentrator Replacement Recommendation Needed schilling (Mar 24)