Re:

[John Nunnally <Nunnally () HARDING EDU>]

If an organization is going to accept anonymous accusations from
"whistleblowers", then they need to formalize some kind of conduit to
receive those comments other than email.  Email is far too unreliable a
source for any communication that would be given that kind of weight.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valdis Kletnieks [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:22 PM
> To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
> Subject: Re: [SECURITY]
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:45:47 CDT, Theresa Semmens said:
>
> > This is to get at the situation where someone uses an alias to
> > communicate on a work related matter to someone else.
>
> If you do this, make sure you address the whistleblower
> scenario - somebody who's doing that to their boss may very
> well use an alias to communicate with the higher-ups....