BreachExchange mailing list archives
Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study
From: "Nash, Kim" <Kim_Nash () ziffdavis com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:49:49 -0400
However, at least now we do have some data to analyze and in the future as technology, privacy laws, cyber-law enforcement, and privacy lawsuits all mature then we will know more. ================= I suppose you guys have seen this, from FTC. They're inviting public comments, as well. http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/02/authentication.htm --kim
_______________________________________________ Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () attrition org) http://attrition.org/dataloss Tracking more than 149 million compromised records in 598 incidents over 7 years.
Current thread:
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study gets press making claims, (continued)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study gets press making claims B.K. DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study getspress making claims James Childers (Mar 14)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study gets press making claims Adam Shostack (Mar 14)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Bill Yurcik (Mar 14)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Adam Shostack (Mar 14)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Bill Yurcik (Mar 15)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Jim Neister (Mar 15)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Adam Shostack (Mar 15)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Bill Yurcik (Mar 14)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Chris Walsh (Mar 15)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Bill Yurcik (Mar 15)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study Nash, Kim (Mar 15)
- Re: seriously flawed U Washington breach study gets press making claims B.K. DeLong (Mar 14)