Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: SMBLoris
From: Oliver Friedrichs <oliverfriedrichs () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 11:47:23 -0700
Sorry to see that things haven’t changed. While it’s certainly not as sexy as RCE, it’s damaging, can lead to data loss, and as you point out, an enterprise wide outage. Found the first one of these in NT in 1998 while reversing Microsoft’s DCE-RPC implementation which at the time was not yet documented: http://insecure.org/sploits/NT.smb.login.DOS.html Oliver From: Dailydave <dailydave-bounces () lists immunityinc com> on behalf of Dave Aitel <dave.aitel () gmail com> Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 11:27 AM To: "dailydave () lists immunityinc com" <dailydave () lists immunityinc com> Subject: [Dailydave] SMBLoris So I know it's Microsoft Tuesday, but we've been working on that SMBLoris bug a bit more for release to customers as well, and as part of that, we're spending a lot of time thinking about it, as deceptively simple as it is. The thing I'm wondering is why people outside of FinancialSec think DoS is almost a non-issue. Most companies have only a few domain controllers, and when those go down, the company goes down. And they have to be reachable on these exact ports, from anywhere in the company, essentially. It seems like this is one of those things that got a tiny splash of attention, but could be worth more. :) -dave _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunityinc com https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunityinc com https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- SMBLoris Dave Aitel (Aug 08)
- Re: SMBLoris Oliver Friedrichs (Aug 08)
- Re: SMBLoris Konrads Smelkovs (Aug 08)
- Re: SMBLoris Bob Auger (Aug 10)