Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: CSI 2008 Redux
From: Alexander Sotirov <alex () sotirov net>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:06:00 -0800
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 08:03:28AM -0500, Dave Aitel wrote:
And I don't understand why you need a trusted computing chip if you decide to trust your hypervisor in the first place. Trusting the hypervisor instead of a public key on a chip from Dell makes a lot more sense. It's more configurable in a user-friendly way, and less configurable in a RIAA/Big Brother friendly way.
Because with a TPM chip you can verify (remotely) that the hypervisor that booted on the machine is really the one you trust, and not a malicious or backdoored one. Alex
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- CSI 2008 Redux Dave Aitel (Nov 22)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux RB (Nov 23)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux Matthijs Koot (Nov 26)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux RB (Nov 27)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux Bruce Ediger (Nov 27)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux RB (Nov 28)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux Matthijs Koot (Nov 26)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux RB (Nov 23)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux Joanna Rutkowska (Nov 23)
- Re: CSI 2008 Redux Alexander Sotirov (Nov 24)