Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Speculation
From: "Anthony Lineberry" <anthony.lineberry () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:13:25 -0700
Its good that people are raising an eyebrow. Because people shouldn't be able to always just make an unverified claim. But IMO, this situation went over fairly smooth. From the sounds of it, Vendors have been working to get patches released, and the patches are being applied. Cant complain about that at the end of the day. And Dan has a pretty good track record as well. But even he admits that wasn't a good enough excuse and realized that it might have been handled a bit better. -- Anthony Lineberry Sr Software Engineer NeuralIQ, Inc www.neuraliq.com On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Halvar Flake <halvar () gmx de> wrote:
Hey all, one question that I forgot: Was it OK to speculate about the DNS problem, or is that considered irresponsible, too ? Cheers, Halvar _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Speculation Halvar Flake (Jul 17)
- Re: Speculation Anthony Lineberry (Jul 18)
- Re: Speculation Alexander Sotirov (Jul 18)
- Re: Speculation Paul Vixie (Jul 18)
- Re: Speculation Marc Maiffret (Jul 18)
- Re: Speculation Paul Vixie (Jul 18)
- Re: Speculation Thomas Ptacek (Jul 19)
- Re: Speculation Paul Vixie (Jul 19)
- Re: Speculation Thomas Ptacek (Jul 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Speculation Thomas Ptacek (Jul 19)
- Re: Speculation Paul Vixie (Jul 18)
- Re: Speculation Alexander Sotirov (Jul 24)