Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode

[Holden Williamson <limeyhaqr () gmail com>]

> I prefer "In the year of our Lord, one thousand nine hundred and
> ninety two." It sounds much more distinguished and on par with a
> college-level course.

Or we could all start speaking in latin, refer to it as Ano Domini and
take the level of the academic posing that this entire situation has
become to whole new and nausiating levels.
Or we could just all stfu.
 
> As you jump to conclusions about the ability of your fellow list
> readers, perhaps you could give us the benefit of the doubt and
> explore the possibility that it was Cisco's decision to move to
> so-called "virtualized processes" that surprised some of us,
> effectively lowering the shellcode bar and making the execution of
> code on Cisco gear something that can be achieved by those of us not
> residing on security's Mount Olympus. ;-)

I'm sorry. There's really just nothing more I can add to this.
My posing-proof vest has been breached. I've lost the will to argue.

<3

-holden
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave