Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode
From: byte_jump <bytejump () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:44:38 -0600
On 8/1/05, Holden Williamson <limeyhaqr () gmail com> wrote:
This is computer security 101. It's not 1992AD anymore guys.
I prefer "In the year of our Lord, one thousand nine hundred and ninety two." It sounds much more distinguished and on par with a college-level course.
If anyone really sat there and thought "wow, I never thought about remotely executing code on a cisco before" then they should be probably be asking themselves why they're playing with this security muck in the first place.
As you jump to conclusions about the ability of your fellow list readers, perhaps you could give us the benefit of the doubt and explore the possibility that it was Cisco's decision to move to so-called "virtualized processes" that surprised some of us, effectively lowering the shellcode bar and making the execution of code on Cisco gear something that can be achieved by those of us not residing on security's Mount Olympus. ;-) _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode surreal (Jul 28)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode security curmudgeon (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode I)ruid (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode I)ruid (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Jul 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Dennis Cox (Jul 29)
- RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Paul Melson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode TAREK (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode M. Shirk (Aug 02)
- RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Todd Towles (Aug 02)