Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm]
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 20:27:30 +0400
I would highly encourage you to write a NASL script and submit it to us. You'll see that we maintain your copyright, and will also maintain your code if we find issues or false positives with it over time. Tenable's only policy (besides not accepting just poorly written NASL scripts, stuff that has high false positive rates, .etc) is that we won't take NASL scripts for recently disclosed vulnerabilities. Looking through the last 30 NASLs added, there were at least two non-Tenable folks contributing to the GPL feeds.
I don't want to be a kiddie and say something without backing it up with proof/code, but I have a proposition. You take that back. Call me a kiddie if you like but going down to the details is becoming inflammatory. If you can send here unsubstantiated claims, there is no reason for me to provide with my evidence when I do the same. I believe (I am naturally, delusional) that you (Tenable) did indeed put your name on plugin(s) you did not write. Check me on it as again, I am naturally wrong by saying this. How do I think that I feel that I know that? Because I do search the web for plugins (which is difficult as you try and kill anything that is not Tenable controlled and release only what suits you), and there have been some occasion(s) where a certain plugin later appeared on your site with the wrong name on it. Obviously by mistake. Now, as I don't back this up but rather raise a voice of concern and suspicion, hoping beyond hope that you will put my mind at ease, just responding to your public claims.... How about we do a full audit of your 7K plugins? :) How about we don't? How about you prove me wrong, in my many faults? How about you substantiate your claims and tell us what plugins you deny, when and why before I send in my data? Point is, I appreciate and even look up to open source companies, and I really like people who try to make money - nothing wrong with it. What I dislike is people who try to do what you do - which is basically "let's kill the community so that we can make a buck" and "create a dependency on our services by not allowing others to contribute on a large scale". And putting down snort.. now that was low. Gadi. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: Funny note here on a worm, (continued)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Gadi Evron (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Jason (May 01)
- RE: Funny note here on a worm Kyle Quest (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Jason (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Gadi Evron (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Jason (May 01)
- RE: Funny note here on a worm Ron Gula (May 01)
- bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Gadi Evron (May 01)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Ron Gula (May 01)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] byte_jump (May 01)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Ron Gula (May 02)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] John Lampe (May 03)
- Message not available
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Gadi Evron (May 03)
- bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Gadi Evron (May 01)