Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Buffer overflow prevention
From: Thomas Sjögren <thomas () northernsecurity net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 20:27:49 +0200
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:26:47PM +0200, Mariusz Woloszyn wrote:
I see no real reason why the major Linux companies are not using it for its products.
Me neither, but the Adamantix (www.adamantix.org) distribution is a step in the right direction. It's based on Debian and uses SSP, PaX and rebuilds every packages with -fstack-protector for example. Its worth checking out. /Thomas -- == thomas () northernsecurity net | thomas () se linux org == Encrypted e-mails preferred | GPG KeyID: 114AA85C --
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention, (continued)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Timo Sirainen (Aug 14)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Jedi/Sector One (Aug 14)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Peter Busser (Aug 15)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Timo Sirainen (Aug 14)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Jedi/Sector One (Aug 14)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Miod Vallat (Aug 14)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Peter Busser (Aug 15)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention stealth (Aug 15)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Mark Tinberg (Aug 18)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Crispin Cowan (Aug 18)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Peter Busser (Aug 18)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Crispin Cowan (Aug 15)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Shaun Clowes (Aug 18)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Crispin Cowan (Aug 18)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Mark Handley (Aug 18)
- Re: Buffer overflow prevention Crispin Cowan (Aug 18)