Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof
From: mouse () RODENTS MONTREAL QC CA (der Mouse)
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 02:13:14 -0500
on linux /dev/kmem is +w for gid kmem, on bsd too (probably, I didn't checked that),
On what grounds do you think this is probable? Certainly the modern
BSDs don't have this particular bug (someone already said FreeBSD
didn't, and I can say with fair assurance NetBSD doesn't - certainly
*my* NetBSD boxes don't, and I'm sure I didn't touch that particular
setting. Given its genesis, OpenBSD probably not only is safe now but
has been as long as it's existed.)
I *think* this may even have been fixed back in the 4.3 days, but I
can't recall for sure; that was too long ago.
der Mouse
mouse () rodents montreal qc ca
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Current thread:
- NcFTPd remote buffer overflow, (continued)
- NcFTPd remote buffer overflow Julien Nadeau (Feb 23)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Alan Cox (Feb 19)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Alex Shnitman (Feb 20)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Wichert Akkerman (Feb 21)
- Possible DOS attack in the .nu domain service Shane Wegner (Feb 20)
- Severe Security Hole in ARCserve NT agents (fwd) Weld Pond (Feb 21)
- Administrivia Aleph One (Feb 22)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Friedrichs, Oliver (Feb 18)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Eric Stevens (Feb 19)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof johann sebastian bach (Feb 19)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof der Mouse (Feb 19)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Zhodiac (Feb 21)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Ronny Cook (Feb 21)