Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: [proftpd-l] root compromise ? (fwd)

From: monk () MEDHOPE RO (monk)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:40:12 +0200


On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Joe Schmo wrote:

I believe the current proftpd...1.2.0pre1 is patched already

Nope... Not by default it isn't... Got it and had to patch it (using
proftpd.org's patch and my own) to make it invulnerable...

Current thread:

Re: [proftpd-l] root compromise ? (fwd) Rodrigo Campos (Feb 09)
- Re: [proftpd-l] root compromise ? (fwd) Joe Schmo (Feb 12)
  - Re: [proftpd-l] root compromise ? (fwd) monk (Feb 13)
  - Re: [proftpd-l] root compromise ? (fwd) Dirk Moerenhout (Feb 13)
    - Possible Netscape Crypto Security Flaw Haze (Feb 14)
    - Re: Possible Netscape Crypto Security Flaw Pete Krawczyk (Feb 16)
    - snap utility for AIX. Larry W. Cashdollar (Feb 17)
    - Re: snap utility for AIX. Brian Hauber (Feb 18)
    - mSQL vulnerability. Christofer C. Bell (Feb 17)
    - OT: Copyright on Security advisories Aviram Jenik (Feb 18)
    - Re: OT: Copyright on Security advisories Doug Granzow (Feb 19)
    - Re: mSQL vulnerability. John W. Temples (Feb 18)
    - Debian GNU/Linux 2.0r5 released (fwd) Jamie Fifield (Feb 17)

(Thread continues...)