Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!
From: adam () bwh harvard edu (Adam Shostack)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 08:24:37 -0500 (EST)
| RC2 and RC4 are both public key systems -- then why wouldn't factoring | the key prove equally as (greatly more) effective as with attacks on | RSA/PGP. | __pardon_my_misunderstanding__but__? | No, rc2 and rc4 are secret key ciphers, which are sometimes used in conjunction with public key systems. The keys are hopefully random, and not the product of two primes. Adam -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume
Current thread:
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (Mar 14)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Perry E. Metzger (Mar 14)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Vishy Gopalakrishnan (Mar 14)
- Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Jonathan Cooper (Mar 15)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Mark G. Scheuern (Mar 15)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! That Whispering Wolf... (Mar 16)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Software Test Account (Mar 16)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Adam Shostack (Mar 17)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Allan Sutton (Mar 17)
- Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Jonathan Cooper (Mar 15)
- Problems with wuftpd - password logging(?) DaVe McComb (Mar 16)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods David Miller (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Paul C Leyland (Mar 17)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods William McVey (Mar 17)