Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods
From: softtest () wu1 wl aecl ca (Software Test Account)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 08:50:12 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 14 Mar 1995, Dr. Frederick B. Cohen wrote:
In the tech notes that I have, it would seemt that RC2 uses a 128bit key and RC4 uses a 256bit key. Both these keys seem rather small in comparison to something like PGP's 1028bit key.128bit key is about 40 digits - NSA approved - breakable by a PC in a few hours. FC
You have actually done this with a PC? With what kind of hw/sw??? Seems other comments would suggest that this would be an unlikely occurence. Can you expand on your statement. Erik ____ _____ _______ __ Erik Lindquist / _ | / ___/ / _____/ / / Systems Administrator / /_| | / /__ / / / / AECL Whiteshell Laboratories / __ | / ___/ / / / / VOICE: (204) 753-2311x3145 / / | | / /____ / /_____ / /_____ FAX: (204) 753-2455 /_/ |_| /______/ /_______/ /________/ E-mail: lindquie () wu1 wl aecl ca
Current thread:
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (Mar 14)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Perry E. Metzger (Mar 14)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Vishy Gopalakrishnan (Mar 14)
- Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Jonathan Cooper (Mar 15)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Mark G. Scheuern (Mar 15)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! That Whispering Wolf... (Mar 16)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Software Test Account (Mar 16)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Adam Shostack (Mar 17)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Allan Sutton (Mar 17)
- Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Jonathan Cooper (Mar 15)
- Problems with wuftpd - password logging(?) DaVe McComb (Mar 16)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods David Miller (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Paul C Leyland (Mar 17)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods William McVey (Mar 17)