Bugtraq mailing list archives
Would an encrypted tunnel solve the SeqNo guessing attack?
From: bet () std sbi com (Bennett Todd)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 1995 16:04:24 -0500 (EST)
I'm not keen on the idea of people grabbing my telnet session away from me and making free with it. I'm resigned to the notion that they can steal it; I'd like to make it useless to them once they've got it. Suppose I took term (a multiplexing, compressing, error-correcting serial tunnel program) and added encryption, and rigged that to be my login shell. I'd log in to the computer, and after my S/Key prompt it'd fire up an encrypted term. I don't see any way some could burgle in through that. Have I missed something fundamental here? Or would this work? -Bennett bet () sbi com
Current thread:
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Dave Mitchell (Jan 26)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jonathan M. Bresler (Jan 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jon Peatfield (Jan 26)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Paul Traina (Jan 26)
- Would an encrypted tunnel solve the SeqNo guessing attack? Bennett Todd (Jan 26)
- Re: Would an encrypted tunnel solve the SeqNo guessing attack? Mark (Jan 26)
- Loaded system no protection. Leo Bicknell (Jan 27)
- Re: Would an encrypted tunnel solve the SeqNo guessing attack? Marc Tamsky (Jan 27)
- Re: Would an encrypted tunnel solve the SeqNo guessing attack? Paul Robinson (Jan 27)
- Very Confused!! Mohamad A Khatoun (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Paul Traina (Jan 26)
- Notes from Tsutomo's Talk Michael B. Dilger (Jan 26)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Pete Shipley (Jan 26)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jon Peatfield (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Aleph One (Jan 31)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Daniel O'Callaghan (Jan 26)