Re: Hackers Out of Business?

[jeromie () mmp com (jeromie)]

>   Sure, sounds secure, but not very useful. I happen to like things like
> mbone, name resolution, nfs mounting internet archives, talk, the variety of 
> games that require UDP, FSP, etc.

Name Resolution can be used fine though a firewall, just takes a little of coaxing.  Reguarding MBONE & NFS, well 
hopefully we all know their inherent risks, and you obviously put funtionality before security.  Other companies 
security
policies may differ.

> >     The product seems pretty good from what I've read thus far.
>
>   Well, then Winn suckered you in. :-) Just be warned, you can duplicate
> perhaps 98% of the functionality for free, and it won't even require
> any programming. In fact, you can probably get more functionality,
> since I'm sure UDP proxies exist.

        Yes, you can duplicate just about everything it's doing, other than 
packet filtering based on the data content (as far as I know, no public package is available to do that).  I would also 
agree you could get more functionality
if you're putting together your own homebrew of security remedies.

>   Well, you're confusing public recognition with knowledge. SCTC is
> probably more well known in their (DoD?) circles than Ches or Bellovin.
> Besides, AT&T may have a grudge. :-)

    Yes, obviously SCTC would be a much better evaluator.