Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Hard Drive Forensics Question
From: "Mike Staples" <mstaples () wvii com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:45:29 -0400
However, disproving them (assuming that they cannot find anything) would be nothing but beneficial for him.
Having to disprove them is antithetical to the "innocent until proven guilty" concept, and requires one to justify one's own continued right to freedom rather than requiring any who wish to abridge that freedom to make a case supporting the abridgment. Giving over the hard drive in the absence of a legal compulsion to do so is apt to be against the advice of a lawyer - who, as has been said before, should be consulted before the individual in question takes or agrees to take any course of action.
Current thread:
- Hard Drive Forensics Question Matt Perry (Oct 02)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Jon Gucinski (Oct 03)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Razi Shaban (Oct 03)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Mike Hale (Oct 03)
- RE: Hard Drive Forensics Question Mike Staples (Oct 06)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question B 650 (Oct 03)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Razi Shaban (Oct 03)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Larry Offley (Oct 03)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Razi Shaban (Oct 03)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question J. Oquendo (Oct 03)
- RE: Hard Drive Forensics Question Murda Mcloud (Oct 06)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Razi Shaban (Oct 06)
- RE: Hard Drive Forensics Question Murda Mcloud (Oct 06)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Razi Shaban (Oct 06)
- RE: Hard Drive Forensics Question Murda Mcloud (Oct 06)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Razi Shaban (Oct 06)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Razi Shaban (Oct 03)
- Re: Hard Drive Forensics Question Jon Gucinski (Oct 03)