Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Re: Why open source software is more secure
From: zenmasterbob123 () gmail com
Date: 9 May 2008 14:28:14 -0000
Agreed. It is pretty thorough. But it is also about half a decade out of date. Statements like "At least one insurance company has indicated that Windows NT is less secure than Unix or GNU/Linux systems, resulting in higher premiums for Windows-based systems" make it a little difficult to take the paper seriously, rather like discussing the security disadvantages of a token ring system.
Current thread:
- Re: Why open source software is more secure, (continued)
- Re: Why open source software is more secure Alexander Klimov (May 12)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Robinson, Sonja (May 12)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Craig Wright (May 13)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Hayes, Ian (May 13)
- Re: Why open source software is more secure Chad Perrin (May 13)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Robinson, Sonja (May 12)
- Re: Why open source software is more secure Alexander Klimov (May 12)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Craig Wright (May 13)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Murda Mcloud (May 09)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Chuck Taylor (May 09)
- RE: Why open source software is more secure Nick Vaernhoej (May 09)