Re: DNSs, MXs and RBLs....

[Santiago Barahona <sant-bar () dsv su se>]

yep, your right...

that's why posed the question to the list...

I guess the company has accepted this risk de facto...

what I guess I will do is try to see how this may be included in a  
SLA... (mention that because the probability of having a degradation  
of the email service due to various factors... including falling into  
one of these blacklists by accident... or having problems with the  
other DNS... etc....)....

many thanks to all who answered!!


On 24 Mar 2008, at 17:33, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:

> On 2008-03-22 Santiago Barahona wrote:
> > I was wondering, if an anti-spam solution (RBLd, DNBL....) before
> > blacklisting an IP it may do some tests to verify it is spamming  
> > IP...
> > would this type of configuration be perceived as such?
>
> That is entirely up to the guy(s) who maintain the blacklist. Some do,
> Some don't.
>
> Regards
> Ansgar Wiechers
> --
> "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches
> becoming available."
> --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq