Re: What about Kaspersky AV?

[Karla Lucas <klucas () sheridan hpmin com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jon R. Kibler wrote:
| parveenvashishtha () yahoo com wrote:
|> Infact Symantec Endpoint Security solution is really good at
|> protecting your organization from known and unknown threats and
|> enforce security policies on laptops, desktops, servers, and mobile
|> devices. A combination of antivirus, anti-spyware, firewall, intrusion
|> prevention, device control, and network-independent access control
|> provide unprecedented security for your systems and networks
|>
|
| Sorry, but I had to pick myself off the floor from laughing before I
| could reply.

I agree. Ours is a small network (52 machines) but when I took the job
all but two of the machines were running Symantec, and not a single one
of them was clean. They averaged 4 active infections per box, some much
higher. The other two were running McAfee, and one of them wouldn't boot
properly until I removed it.

The first thing I did was switch to Kaspersky. In three years malware
has tried to infect the network only 3 times that I am aware of, and
Kaspersky caught them all.

- --
Karla Lucas
ITM/HIPAA SO, Sheridan County Health Complex
826 18th St., Box 167
Hoxie, KS  67740
PH: (785) 675-3281 Ext. 165
E-Mail: klucas () sheridan hpmin com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH4mblkixC07R6u1ARAlyQAJ9SzunjMDhWNV/Jhl6ioiG0TIrSwACcDgQI
9mXzQPf8a4pYg2du0zySc0U=
=jPjL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----