Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Height of paranoia
From: "Scott Race" <scott () jda-networks com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:22:01 -0700
Sometimes info can leak through simple and ancient techniques. As an IT guy, I know about all of my execs passwords. Who knows who else does. So, having them change their passwords would be my first thought. Second, you might check the Exchange permissions inside their AD account to see who else has access to their email account. I have seen some weird stuff before - a client who was going thru a divorce had info leaking, come to find out somehow his ex-wife's name had full permission to his mailbox and she was loading his account up in her Outlook. Also keep in mind that the Administrator account probably has access to their email as well, it's as simple as File > Open > Other Users Folder. So check the permissions just to make sure nothing obvious is jumping out at you. The other suggestions are all good too. I just think it's good to start with the basic obvious stuff - you can lock down the network all you want but if someone owns the password, they pretty much own the user. Scott -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Adam Pal Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:48 AM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Cc: hkhasgiwale () gmail com Subject: Re: Height of paranoia Hi Wali As a fist measurement, i would separate the executive managers network, move the stations to another/new network segment. There you can also enable a different set of ACL rules. As a 2nd measurement i would use point-to-point encryption, high confidential emails should be encryptet however so that would be a good time to apply it. There are a lot of tools, but you can pick one which is costs-effective and easy to implement in outlook. regards Adam Pal -------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:55:14 +0400 Von: "WALI" <hkhasgiwale () gmail com> An: security-basics () securityfocus com Betreff: Height of paranoia
It's a given that all workstations have XP firewall enabled, an enterprise grade antivirus and Windows defender installed. I am the security guy. The need is that there are a couple top management executives that have highly confidential data/emails residing on their desktops, and quite a few times, the information seems to have leaked out. Discounting the 'word of mouth' of their secretaries or the end recipients of that information, I want to take as many precautions from the IT security perspective as possible and even bring our domain admins and helpdesk personnel into the realm of doubt. We have a Windows 20003/exchange 2003 environment of about a 2000 users. Here's what I have thought: 1. If I detach these executive PCs from the domain. Mails will stop landing in MS Outlook. Is there a way around? Also DNS security doesn't register any PC unless it's joined to a domain. I thought of this to make it out of bounds by system/domain admins. I have a feeling that their port 3389 gets accessed when they aren't around. 2. Alternatively, create a private vlan on the core switch and make these PCs as it's members. Put an ACL and deny everything except ports required to authenticate to AD and exchange and few other web applications. Monitor port memberships regularly. 3. How to secure their emails from exchange admins (it's the height, I know). Pls advise!!
-- Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen? Der Eine für Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03
Current thread:
- SIM questions. Ray Van Dolson (Aug 19)
- Re: SIM questions. ॐ aditya mukadam ॐ (Aug 20)
- Re: SIM questions. Adriel Desautels (Aug 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SIM questions. Andy Cuff (Talisker) (Aug 20)
- Height of paranoia WALI (Aug 27)
- Re: Height of paranoia Adriel Desautels (Aug 28)
- RE: Height of paranoia Murda Mcloud (Aug 28)
- Re: Height of paranoia Adam Pal (Aug 28)
- RE: Height of paranoia Scott Race (Aug 28)
- RE: Height of paranoia Rivest, Philippe (Aug 28)
- Re: Height of paranoia pinowudi (Aug 28)
- Message not available
- Re:Height of paranoia reflect ocean (Aug 28)
- Height of paranoia WALI (Aug 27)
- Re: Height of paranoia Chad Perrin (Aug 28)
- Re: Height of paranoia David J. Bianco (Aug 28)