Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
From: Syv Ritch <syv () 911networks com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:21:59 -0700
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:22:47 +0530 "Vivek P" <iamherevivek () gmail com> wrote:
hi all I am on a lookout for IP hiding & anonymity for a project of mine!
I wanted to get directions frm hw best can i get my identity hidden! atleast without using a proxy server from some providers (like anonymiser)...
It's actually not possible without using a proxy. Either you are using TCP or UPD packets, either way the other end has to reply to your IP address or you will not receive the replying packets. Packets without IP addresses are rejected by almost all routers as invalid packets. The only thing that you can do is a denial of service by injecting an incorrect/invalid/other IP address. -- Thanks
Current thread:
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss, (continued)
- Message not available
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 18)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Rohin Koul (Sep 26)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 26)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 27)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 27)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss gjgowey (Sep 28)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 28)