Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects...
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 03:57:36 +0200
On 2007-05-31 Craig Wright wrote:
In contradiction to the belief of many on the list, people have a right to be stupid and live in ignorance. I may not like this, but it is a fundamental tenant of freedom. To have freedom means the right to be daft. The right to be daft means the right to have an insecure site.
If you believe that people have the right to be stupid and insecure when their stupidity and insecurity may cause damage to other people you're mistaken.
They will learn eventually.
No, unfortunately they don't. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq
Current thread:
- Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Dark Cold Ice (May 29)
- RE: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... James Wilburn (May 30)
- Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Lee Lawson (May 30)
- Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Steve Friedl (May 30)
- Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Lee Lawson (May 30)
- RE: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Craig Wright (May 30)
- Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Lee Lawson (May 30)
- RE: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... James Wilburn (May 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Craig Wright (May 30)
- RE: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Craig Wright (May 30)
- Re: Disclosure of vulns and its legal aspects... Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (May 31)