Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: SORBS
From: mbs <mbs () mistrealm com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:23:28 -0500
I am considering setting up our Exchange servers to use some sort of SPAM blocking list service. SORBS sounds like the wrong choice. Are there any better options, or should I just learn to love deleting SPAM?
Michael Dan Tesch wrote:
That organization is un-believable, good luck! I spent at least 40 hours over the course of a month or two trying to get a domain off their list. Seemed like every time I passed one of their criteria, there was something else wrong. It came down to the fact that the server IP was in a block of SBC addresses that they didn't like howthey were configured.-----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of policysup () gmail com Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 2:20 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: SORBSIn trying to get de-listed from SORBS I get: " the someone is lying, pay the fine response." A friend once said: "Life is so much easier when you assume that anyone who disagrees with you is evil. Cuts down on the need to take responsibility or do any real objective thinking.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer. http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- SORBS policysup (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: SORBS radkins (Jan 08)