Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: application for an employment
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:38:00 +0200
On 2006-03-29 Craddock, Larry wrote:
That may be how you interpret it but I think they're very analogous. The point is simple ... no one has any legitimate business checking the status of the doors and windows on my property and no one has any legitimate business port scanning someone else's network. What legitimate reason would I have in port scanning your network? Let me answer that for you ... absolutely none. At best, my answer would be curiosity and that doesn't qualify as legitimate.
*sigh* I'd rather stayed out of this discussion, but since various people have shown a gross ignorance of the technial realities of the 'net I'll throw my 2 cent in. The legitimate reason you have is the simple fact that you don't have any other option of determining what services are available on a given host or range of hosts. It's absolutely ridiculous to think that one would need express permission to find out whether a shop is open or not. Or if there is a shop in the first place. Of course if your scan breaks something you may (or may not) be held liable for that, but that's a different story. FWIW Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The Norwich University program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Tailor your education to your own professional goals with degree customizations including Emergency Management, Business Continuity Planning, Computer Emergency Response Teams, and Digital Investigations. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: application for an employment, (continued)
- RE: application for an employment Craig Wright (Mar 28)
- RE: application for an employment Craig Wright (Mar 28)
- RE: application for an employment Craig Wright (Mar 28)
- Re: application for an employment Cesc (Mar 29)
- RE: application for an employment Craig Wright (Mar 29)
- RE: Spam:RE: application for an employment Mark Gorman (Mar 29)
- Re: Spam:RE: application for an employment Ian Scott (Mar 30)
- RE: Spam:RE: application for an employment Mark Gorman (Mar 29)
- RE: application for an employment Craig Wright (Mar 29)
- RE: application for an employment Murad Talukdar (Mar 29)
- RE: application for an employment Craddock, Larry (Mar 29)
- Re: application for an employment Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Mar 30)
- RE: application for an employment David Gillett (Mar 30)
- Re: application for an employment Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Mar 30)
- RE: application for an employment David Gillett (Mar 31)
- Re: application for an employment Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Mar 31)
- Re: application for an employment Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Mar 30)
- Re: application for an employment Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Mar 31)
- Re: application for an employment Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Mar 31)