RE: Hashing Functions

["Micheal Espinola Jr" <michealespinola () gmail com>]

No worries.  I was hoping that something substantial info might have
actually been released.  :)

--
ME2
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven DeFord [mailto:security.willworker () gmail com] 
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 1:40 PM
To: Micheal Espinola Jr
Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Hashing Functions

Although, after reading the linked-to paper, they haven't really said much
of anything other than "We did it!"

So I retract my (implied) claim that details have been published.

Apologies
Steve


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:27:14 -0800, Steven DeFord
<security.willworker () gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:14:06 -0500, Micheal Espinola Jr 
> <michealespinola () gmail com> wrote:
> > Has it definitively been broken?  I know I have read reports that it
>
> Bruce Schneier's blog post about the collision attack:
> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>
> The paper itself:
> http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf
>
> --
> Steven DeFord
> Security.Willworker () gmail com
> (925) 596-0426


--
Steven DeFord
Security.Willworker () gmail com
(925) 596-0426