Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Hashing Functions
From: Micheal Espinola Jr <michealespinola () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:14:06 -0500
Has it definitively been broken? I know I have read reports that it is 'reported' to have been broken by a known group of individuals in China - but details were still not released, nor has there been any official word/release about it. Has this status changed? If so, got link? Thanks, On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:21:04 -0800, Steven DeFord <security.willworker () gmail com> wrote:
I know SHA-1 has been broken. What does this mean for SHA-n (for n <> 1)? Are they significantly different algorithms, or something similar but with longer key length? -- Steven DeFord Security.Willworker () gmail com (925) 596-0426
-- ME2 my home: <http://www.santeriasys.net/> my photos: <http://mespinola.blogspot.com/>
Current thread:
- Hashing Functions Steven DeFord (Mar 24)
- Re: Hashing Functions Micheal Espinola Jr (Mar 28)
- Re: Hashing Functions Steven DeFord (Mar 29)
- Re: Hashing Functions Steven DeFord (Mar 29)
- RE: Hashing Functions Micheal Espinola Jr (Mar 29)
- Re: Hashing Functions Steven DeFord (Mar 29)
- Re: Hashing Functions Micheal Espinola Jr (Mar 28)
- Re: Hashing Functions Julien Gremillot (Mar 28)