Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RPC over HTTP security
From: <sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com>
Date: 28 Jan 2005 10:36:48 -0000
In-Reply-To: <921115752CD94C48BF2F2B8A46AFC1B30398D8@mail3.vdc2.local> Thanks to all who responded Just a few remarks: Referring to the 'tons of links on http://www.microsoft.com/security', not all the tons of link are related to RPC over HTTP What I really wanted to know is 'How secure is RPC over HTTP TECHNOLOGY'? Is this setup similar to allowing RPC access through port 80 and 443 INSTEAD OF 135, 445... ? If this is the case, then vulnerabilities like the RPC DCOM could well be exploited... and what of future vulnerabilities... So is RPC over HTTP equivalent as if we are opening ports 139, 445 to the server? thanks all
Current thread:
- RE: RPC over HTTP security, (continued)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Kevin Doheny (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Paris E. Stone (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Price, Robert H (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Eric McCarty (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Shawn Wall (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Sarbjit Singh Gill (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Shawn Wall (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Depp, Dennis M. (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Shawn Wall (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Killian Doyle (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Depp, Dennis M. (Jan 28)
- Re: RPC over HTTP security sf_mail_sbm (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Eric McCarty (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Beauford, Jason (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Depp, Dennis M. (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security LordInfidel (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Depp, Dennis M. (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security James McGee (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Shawn Wall (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security LordInfidel (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Paris E. Stone (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Depp, Dennis M. (Jan 31)