Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RBLs for SPAM Control
From: Devdas Bhagat <devdas () dvb homelinux org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 22:09:05 +0530
On 05/08/05 01:48 +1000, Alexis wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 02:12 pm, you wrote:As a rule of thumb, most RBLS automatically list dynamic IPs used for dial ups / modem pools of ISPs as suspicious. Simply because any mail from a dynamic IP is considered unsafe, in RBL terms !Interesting . . . . i wonder how many false-positives this creates? i would think it would be quite a few, given the number of people who send emails from dynamic IPs . . . .
In terms of spam blocked? Almost none. If you are on a dynamic IP, use your ISPs outbound SMTP server to relay your mail. Devdas Bhagat
Current thread:
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control security (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RBLs for SPAM Control Chris Santerre (Aug 02)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 02)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Micheal Espinola Jr (Aug 02)
- Re: Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Phil Cryer (Aug 03)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Alexis (Aug 03)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 04)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Alexis (Aug 05)
- Message not available
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Alexis (Aug 05)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 08)
- RE: RBLs for SPAM Control David Gillett (Aug 10)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 04)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control maxfield (Aug 08)