Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned]
From: "Shawn Jackson" <sjackson () horizonusa com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:02:07 -0800
-----Original Message----- From: David Gillett [mailto:gillettdavid () fhda edu] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:42 AM To: 'Jef Feltman'; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned]
You call a hotel, and instead of asking for a non-smoking double room overlooking the pool, you ask if room 1 is available, then if room 2 is available, then if room 3 is available, and so on. At some point, this amounts to a denial of service against the hotel switchboard operator....
Dave Gillett
A portscan is a method of checking weather a service is accepting data or not. It's a simple connection that closes if the port responds. A denial of Service would be flooding that port with so much traffic that it can't respond to other requests, that is not the case with a portscan. The hotel Analogy is fundamentally flawed for this argument. You wouldn't be taking with the operator, a portscan would see if you can 'phone' the hotel, then When they pick up you verified the 'port' is open. Talking with the operator is akin to communicating with the port, thus you 'browsing the page' and not just checking to see if the port is open. Shawn --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned], (continued)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Jef Feltman (Mar 17)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] David Gillett (Mar 17)
- Re: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Derek Schaible (Mar 17)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Jef Feltman (Mar 19)
- Re: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Charles Otstot (Mar 22)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Burton M. Strauss III (Mar 15)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] David Gillett (Mar 18)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Jef Feltman (Mar 19)
- Re: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] ~Kevin DavisĀ³ (Mar 19)
- The fallacy of analogies - Enough with throwing rocks at your windows! Burton M. Strauss III (Mar 23)