Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Yet another thread on the legality of port scanning
From: "Shawn Jackson" <sjackson () horizonusa com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:03:32 -0800
The "reasonable man" hypothesis applies to connecting to a system to which authorization is in doubt. Would a reasonable man conclude
that
http://www.cnn.com is an acceptable connection in the absence of explicit permission? I would say yes, he would. Would a reasonable man conclude that ftp://www.cnn.com is an acceptable connection in
the
absence of explicit permission? I would argue no, he would not.
What's
the difference? HTTP is generally accepted to be a public
connection,
in the sense that it is intended as a shared resource, to be accessible to all. FTP is not generally accepted as such, regardless
of what electronic storefront happens to be offering the service.
That's simply not true.
Agreed, it's not true. FTP is a standard, well known protocol for transferring files. Are you saying that website that link to ftp servers to download files, like the protocol was intended to do, is in fault? FTP is as much as accepted as HTTP, seaming they are 'generally' accepted to be a part of the TCP protocol stack. Shawn Jackson Systems Administrator Horizon USA 1190 Trademark Dr #107 Reno NV 89521 www.horizonusa.com Email: sjackson () horizonusa com Phone: (775) 858-2338 (800) 325-1199 x338 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Yet another thread on the legality of port scanning Shawn Jackson (Mar 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Yet another thread on the legality of port scanning Hoang, Binh P,,DMDCWEST (Mar 29)