Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Win95 detection
From: Travis Foley <travis.foley () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:49:16 -0600
You log them through login script using NT based command script.... This would depend alot on the size of your network though... if you are talking 1,000 + machines you'll want to find a tool to do OS detection port scanning. I would have thought you would have had better luck with nmap though. ex: --------- begin script --------------------- ver | find "Windows 95" >nul if not errorlevel 1 goto Win9x :Win9x echo %computername% >>\\server\share\win95.log ---------- end script ----------------------- On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:18:00 -0600, Samuel Petreski <petreski () ksu edu> wrote:
The hosts are not logging to a domain and I need to be able to detect them remotely. Thanks, Samuel Petreski -----Original Message----- From: Trevor Cushen [mailto:Trevor.Cushen () sysnet ie] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:59 AM To: petreski () ksu edu Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Win95 detection Have you tried a login script to do the job for you? Kix32 is perfect for this job. -----Original Message----- From: Samuel Petreski [mailto:petreski () ksu edu] Sent: 30 November 2004 21:53 To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Win95 detection I have been given the task to scan for hosts that are running Windows 95 on the network. I have tried scanning with Nmap and Nessus, however they cannot distinguish the hosts between 95/98/ME. I was wondering if anyone has run across a tool that is able to detect Win95 hosts on the network. Thanks for your help. Samuel Petreski This email and its attachments are solely for the attention of petreski () ksu edu. Please contact Trevor.Cushen () sysnet ie if you receive this mail in error.
Current thread:
- RE: Win95 detection Trevor Cushen (Dec 01)
- RE: Win95 detection Samuel Petreski (Dec 01)
- Re: Win95 detection Travis Foley (Dec 02)
- Re: Win95 detection Micheal Espinola Jr (Dec 02)
- Re: Win95 detection Nathaniel Hall (Dec 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Win95 detection Jeff Gercken (Dec 02)
- RE: Win95 detection Samuel Petreski (Dec 02)
- RE: Win95 detection Jeff Gercken (Dec 03)
- Re: Win95 detection H Carvey (Dec 03)
- Re: Win95 detection q q (Dec 07)
- Re: Win95 detection miguel . dilaj (Dec 07)
- RE: Win95 detection Samuel Petreski (Dec 01)