Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Good Red Hat install
From: Robert Wesley McGrew <rwm8 () CS MsState EDU>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:49:35 -0500 (CDT)
Well, I'm not sure if you're completely set on Redhat for this or not, but it seems like you're wanting this machine to do network testing and run Linux based security tools, so it may be a good idea to look at some other lightweight distributions. In the past I have set up a P100 with 64 megs of ram and a 300 meg hard drive, a P150 laptop with 16 megs and a 1.6 gig drive, and currently a K-6 166 with 128 megs, for situations like you're talking about, and very quickly I found that it can be quite difficult to trim Redhat down to what you need. My weapon of choice in this scenario has been Slackware, latest version you can get your hands on (currently, 9). Use the "expert" installation option so you can pick and choose your packages on an individual basis. On a 233Mhz machine, if you have plenty of ram, and a big enough hard drive to hold the packages you want, you will probably won't have to make many sacrifices. A gig or two will give you enough for a very useful installation; I can get it under 300 megs if I'm careful and have a very well defined plan of what I want the machine to do. Ditch KDE and Gnome because they don't really have anything to offer you in this situation, but keep the Qt and GTK libraries if you can. Unless you're very short on RAM and drive space, there's no reason why you will have to give up X. Get blackbox as your window manager (or wmaker, or your favorite lightweight wm), and you'll at least be able to have a pile of xterms to work with. Slackware may seem daunting at first to someone without a lot of Linux experience, but it's not that bad, and after installation, it's surely no worse than a GUI-less Redhat. If you start getting lost or unsure about packages during the install, have another computer nearby and google anything you're not sure about. It may take a few tries but you'll be able to get it up and going. Keep notes, and let people know how it went. A good description of what you went through in a page, paper, or howto would probably help a lot of other people out too. Good luck, Wesley On Mon, 12 May 2003, Matthew Crape wrote:
Hey all, I am trying to create a somewhat 'standard' install that I can use for Red Hat. The main purpose for this box would to do scans (i.e. nmap) and maybe packet generation to test our firewall. Now I don't have a lot of Linux experience, but I want to install the minimal possible. The test machine that I am using is an old p 233Mhz - so in other words the first thing gone is the gui. Can anyone point me to some HOWTO or something like that? Thanks Matt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thinking About Security Training? You Can't Afford Not To! Vigilar's industry leading curriculum includes: Security +, Check Point, Hacking & Assessment, Cisco Security, Wireless Security & more! Register Now! --UP TO 30% off classes in select cities-- http://www.securityfocus.com/Vigilar-security-basics ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Good Red Hat install Matthew Crape (May 13)
- Re: Good Red Hat install Robert Wesley McGrew (May 13)
- Re: Good Red Hat install Markus Kovero (May 13)
- Re: Good Red Hat install Chris Gioran (May 13)
- Re: Good Red Hat install Aman Raheja (May 13)
- RE: Good Red Hat install Matthew Crape (May 14)
- Re: Good Red Hat install Andrew Hecox (May 14)
- Re: Good Red Hat install z33k666 (May 15)
- Re: Good Red Hat install Carl Inglis (May 17)
- Re: Good Red Hat install z33k666 (May 15)
- Re: Good Red Hat install xlopkov (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Good Red Hat install Allan Schon (May 13)
- Fwd: Re: Good Red Hat install Quentin Hartman (May 15)
(Thread continues...)