Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: WiFi security implications
From: "Security Newsletters-TM" <SecurityNewsletters.tm () telus com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:26:25 -0500
It really doesn't matter. I've been watching this thread for a while. Here are my comments to the original question. 1) IPsec over 802.11 is great, and depending on the IPSec algorythms and key sizes used, almost completely unbreakable except for private millionairs and government agencies. 2) Want even more security, lock down the 802.11 AP. I suspect you're not using a Cisco one, so in that case make sure you do the following i) Enable the highest WEP key possible ii) Change the SSID from default to something crazy that anyone walking by your office with a PDA won't lock onto by accident like "123fjdksfj2342" . iii) Use a different channel than the default. iv) Remove the beacon, or minimize it. v) lock down or filter the Mac address of your laptop. 3) As an alternative, you may wish to move away from the 802.11B spectrum as plenty of kiddies have these 70 dollar cards (CDN). -----Original Message----- From: Ronish Mehta [mailto:sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com] Sent: December 8, 2003 12:32 AM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: WiFi security implications Where does "Airsnarf" fit into this? http://www.inventati.info/pub/defcon11/Beetle/ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: WiFi security implications, (continued)
- Re: WiFi security implications Moshe Ashkenazi (Dec 05)
- RE: WiFi security implications Tres London (Dec 05)
- Re: WiFi security implications Moshe Ashkenazi (Dec 05)
- RE: WiFi security implications David Gillett (Dec 05)
- RE: WiFi security implications David J. Jackson (Dec 04)
- Re: WiFi security implications Tres London (Dec 05)
- RE: WiFi security implications Tres London (Dec 05)
- RE: WiFi security implications Tres London (Dec 05)
- RE: WiFi security implications Tres London (Dec 05)
- RE: WiFi security implications James Tusini (Dec 15)
- Re: WiFi security implications Ronish Mehta (Dec 08)
- RE: WiFi security implications Security Newsletters-TM (Dec 08)
- RE: WiFi security implications Oliver Rebollido (Dec 09)
- RE: WiFi security implications dave kleiman (Dec 10)
- RE: WiFi security implications Steven A. Fletcher (Dec 09)