Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Transparent Screen Lock for Win NT/2000/XP


From: Angie Urtel <aurtel () fastenal com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:19:32 -0500

I just downloaded the newest version and the same thing happened.  I'm using
Xdesk virtual desktop software.  http://www.xdesksoftware.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Cathy Milan [mailto:cathymilan () excite com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:59 AM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Transparent Screen Lock for Win NT/2000/XP


In-Reply-To: <C8A731F5343EA044BF77A732838D223B139FBDB4 () fastenal com>

Hi Angie,



Thanks for the feedback. This is exactly the kind of information

I was looking for.  



I was unable to reproduce your problem so I contacted the company

and was informed that this was a problem that was addressed in

one of the newer versions.  Can you verify this.  I am using

a dual-monitor setup and the problem does not occur.  How exactly

are you set up?



Cathy





I played with it a little since it was nicer than the Clear Screen 
Saver

by

MS.  However, if you are running virtual desktop software, it only 
locks

the

desktop you're on, not the others.  Hence, I could bounce my mouse and 
get

to my secondary desktop that was completely active even though my 
primary

desktop was locked and protected.  That was the kicker for me, at least 
on

client machines.





-----Original Message-----

From: Cathy Milan [mailto:cathymilan () excite com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 6:37 PM

To: security-basics () securityfocus com

Subject: Transparent Screen Lock for Win NT/2000/XP









We have been testing the Transparent Screen Lock







http://www.e-motional.com/TScreenLock.htm







It basically allows you to prevent access to a Windows server



but allows the display to be visible.Before going ahead with



a large scale installation I was wonderingif any of you guys



have had any experience with it (Both good orbad) that may



affect our decision.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---

-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---

--



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---

-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---

--






---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: