Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Calling a dissector: Type for data parameter


From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 00:26:27 -0700

On May 29, 2021, at 12:12 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman58 () gmail com> wrote:

Shouldn't the caller be calling with the right data type or NULL? So a bug in the MQTT disector?

How can the MQTT dissector determine what the right data type *is* - especially given that the dissectors aren't wired 
in, there's a UAT preference that lets the user configure it.

This is where the current mechanism for passing data between dissectors goes crashing to the ground.

MQTT passes a topic string, which is just a string, to the dissectors it calls.

JSON expects to be passed a pointer to an http_message_info_t.

JSON registers its non-heuristic dissector by name, and allows it to be used with Decode As... for UDP ports.

It might *look* safe if you check the UDP dissector and the dissectors that use "media_type" and "grpc_message_type", 
but the "registers its non-heuristic dissector by name" mean there are no guarantees, given that another dissector that 
passes a pointer to something *other* than an http_message_info_t to dissectors that are specified by name in a UAT.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: