Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: config problem - not seeing all messages


From: Fulko Hew <fulko.hew () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 19:45:23 -0400

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 6:12 PM Ron W <ronw.mrmx () gmail com> wrote:

I am trying to use WireShark to diagnose a network problem between a
Windows PC and a Linux-based controller (for a robot).

The controller uses uboot and TFTP to download the Linux image from the
PC. Using the controller's serial port, I can see the messages output by
uboot and by Linux. The messages as as expected and the controller appears
to work correctly except after downloading Linus via TFTP, the PC
application is not able to communicate with the controller via TCP/IP.

So, I connected an Ethernet switch between the PC and the controller and
also connected a laptop to the switch so I can monitor with WireShark.


Your problem is the Ethernet switch you introduced to allow a 3rd device to
(attempt to)
listen in on the conversation.  You can't do that using a switch.  A switch
routes
messages from one port directly to the port belonging to the destination.
It won't get
sent to all the other ports (i.e. your sniffer).  What you need is a hub,
not a switch.
Hubs send everything to all ports.  Switches only send broadcast messages
to all ports.

That's why I kept my 10Mb hub.  Just for these circumstances.

B.T.W. There are some 'managed' hubs that allow you to designate a
'sniffer' port that
will receive all messages to/from a designated 'other' port. That feature
is only available
on the more expensive switches.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: