Re: ASN.1-based dissector decoding by port number vs switch/case using 1st octet

[Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>]

On Jun 22, 2021, at 6:33 PM, Vincent Randal <vtrandal () gmail com> wrote:

> We are using PER per the foo example (Simple ASN.1-based dissector). Wow, I never about all these different encodings.
>
> Maybe we should be using something other than PER? We think we like PER because the dissected values agree with what 
> we can see in the raw UDP data.

You should be using whatever encoding the protocol is using.

Is this a protocol for which you have an ASN.1 specification plus an indication of the encoding being used, or is this 
something you're reverse-engineering?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe