Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?
From: Mario Rugiero <mrugiero () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:32:36 -0300
El sáb., 21 mar. 2020 18:15, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers < tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> escribió:
1) has the slight disadvantage that the name for the team suggests it's for pcapng only; it appears that teams can be renamed: https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-a-team Were we to rename it, I don't know what would be a good new name.
I'd be careful with this option, as it may affect downstream projects, as some download links that may be used for automated download (as part of a build process) could break. If there's anything downloadable I wouldn't change the team's name unless we make sure the old links remain accessible.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Mario Rugiero (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Mar 22)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Tuexen (Mar 22)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Mar 25)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Tuexen (Mar 22)