Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Build failure (kerberos)
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal () wireshark org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:28:46 +0100
Le lun. 23 mars 2020 à 09:17, Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com> a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 6:15 PM Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com> wrote:Ok, thanks. On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Martin Mathieson < martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com> wrote:./asn1/kerberos/packet-kerberos-template.c: In function ‘dissect_krb5_PAC_CREDENTIAL_INFO’: ./asn1/kerberos/packet-kerberos-template.c:2187:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘decrypt_krb5_data’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ./asn1/kerberos/packet-kerberos-template.c:2187:11: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror] ./asn1/kerberos/packet-kerberos-template.c: At top level: ./asn1/kerberos/kerberos.cnf:360:1: error: ‘dissect_kerberos_PA_ENC_TS_ENC’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]I don't know which part of the asn1/cnf/template generates this function. Can anyone guide me through the asn1 dissector generation process?I've found how to remove the definition of the function conditionally. However the definition of static const ber_sequence_t PA_ENC_TS_ENC_sequence[] still remains unused, giving an error. Which part of the cnf generates this definition?
Hi Dario, this is generated automatically unless you put PA-ENC-TS-ENC in the OMIT_ASSIGNMENT section. As asn2wrs.py does not support conditional generation AFAIK, better move it in the template file (together with its dependencies) and add it to the OMIT_ASSIGNMENT. Best regards, Pascal. --
Naima is online. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
Attachment:
kerberos.patch
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Build failure (kerberos) Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Mar 21)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Dario Lombardo (Mar 21)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Mar 22)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Dario Lombardo (Mar 22)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Dario Lombardo (Mar 23)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Pascal Quantin (Mar 23)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Dario Lombardo (Mar 23)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Mar 23)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Mar 22)
- Re: Build failure (kerberos) Dario Lombardo (Mar 21)